Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Diabet Med ; : e14977, 2022 Oct 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230058
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e060302, 2022 06 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1902012

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In July 2020 the UK Government announced an intention to restrict advertisements for products high in fat, salt or sugar on live broadcast, catch-up and on-demand television before 21:00 hours; and paid for online advertising. As no other jurisdiction has implemented similar regulations, there is no empirical evidence about how they might perturb the food system. To guide the regulations' implementation and evaluation, we aimed to develop a concept map to hypothesise their potential consequences for the commercial food system, health and society. METHODS: We used adapted group concept mapping in four virtual workshops with food marketing and regulation experts across academia, civil society, government organisations, and industry (n=14), supported by Miro software. We merged concepts derived from the four workshops to develop a master map and then invited feedback from participants via email to generate a final concept map. RESULTS: The concept map shows how the reactions of stakeholders to the regulations may reinforce or undermine the impact on the commercial food system, health and society. The map shows adaptations made by stakeholders that could reinforce, or undermine, positive impacts on public health. It also illustrates potential weaknesses in the design and implementation of the regulations that could result in little substantial difference to public health. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the regulations' initial implementation or subsequent iterations, they could be altered to maximise the potential for reinforcing adaptations, minimise the potential for undermining adaptations and ensure they cover a wide range of advertising opportunities and foods. The concept map will also inform the design of an evaluation of the regulations and could be used to inform the design and evaluation of similar regulations elsewhere.


Asunto(s)
Publicidad , Alimentos , Industria de Alimentos , Humanos , Televisión , Reino Unido
3.
Diabet Med ; 39(4): e14755, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1550817

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid implementation of remote care delivery in type 1 diabetes. We studied current modes of care delivery, healthcare professional experiences and impact on insulin pump training in type 1 diabetes care in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: The UK Diabetes Technology Network designed a 48-question survey aimed at healthcare professionals providing care in type 1 diabetes. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three healthcare professionals (48% diabetes physicians, 52% diabetes educators and 88% working in adult services) from approximately 75 UK centres (52% university hospitals, 46% general and community hospitals), responded to the survey. Telephone consultations were the main modality of care delivery. There was a higher reported time taken for video consultations versus telephone (p < 0.001). Common barriers to remote consultations were patient familiarity with technology (72%) and access to patient device data (67%). We assessed the impact on insulin pump training. A reduction in total new pump starts (73%) and renewals (61%) was highlighted. Common barriers included patient digital literacy (61%), limited healthcare professional experience (46%) and time required per patient (44%). When grouped according to size of insulin pump service, pump starts and renewals in larger services were less impacted by the pandemic compared to smaller services. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights UK healthcare professional experiences of remote care delivery. While supportive of virtual care models, a number of factors highlighted, especially patient digital literacy, need to be addressed to improve virtual care delivery and device training.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Personal de Salud , Automanejo/educación , Telemedicina , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Tecnología Biomédica/educación , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/instrumentación , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Control Glucémico/instrumentación , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina , Pandemias , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Consulta Remota/métodos , Consulta Remota/organización & administración , Automanejo/métodos , Automanejo/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
4.
Diabetes ; 70, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1362268

RESUMEN

The covid-19 pandemic has led to rapid implementation of remote care delivery in type 1 diabetes (T1D). An understanding of current modes of care delivery and HCP experiences is required to improve care. The UK Diabetes Technology Network undertook an online survey aimed at members providing care in T1D. One hundred and forty three HCPs (47.6% diabetes physicians, 51.8% diabetes educators) from 105 UK NHS centers (51.7% university hospitals, 45.8% general/community hospitals), responded. Median (IQR) percentage of consultations and time taken via face-to-face, telephone and video were 20%(5-30), 30 minutes (20-34);50% (30-80), 20 minutes (15-30) and 10% (0-35), 30 minutes (20-30), respectively. Sixty four percent responded that remote consultations offered an effective strategy for care delivery. Common barriers were patient familiarity with technology (72%) and access to patient device data (67.1%). Devices with smartphone based automated cloud uploads made consultations easier (73.4%), more effective (84.6%) and facilitated hospital discharges (60.9%). Median (IQR) responses on a 7-point scale for effectiveness of remote training, compared to face-to face, for new CSII starts, CSII renewals and CGM starts, were reported as 5 (4-6), 5.5 (5-6) and 6 (5-6), respectively. Common barriers included patient digital literacy (60.8%), limited HCP experience (46.2%) and time required per patient (43.6%). A reduction in new starts (72.8%) and renewals (60.9%) for CSII was highlighted by most. Variation was noted in proportion of new CSII starts being done virtually (53.9% respondents reporting <20% and 32.9% reporting >60%). Most (92.4%) responded that remote consultations and technology training are likely to continue post-Covid19. This survey highlights the impact of COVID-19 on access to diabetes technology and demonstrates how HCP's have embraced remote care delivery, but digital literacy remains a barrier.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA